Bowman

Bowman v. City of Berkeley

Bad Law
122 Cal. App. 4th 572·18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 814·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1572·2004 Daily Journal DAR 11751·34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20097
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 2004A103980California8,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kay, J.

Marie Bowman et al., as individuals and on behalf of Neighbors for Sensible Development for 2517 Sacramento Street (collectively the Neighbors), appeal from the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate to overturn the resolution of the City of Berkeley (the City) authorizing Affordable Housing Associates (the Developer) to construct a housing complex for senior citizens (the Project). The Neighbors contend that the City erred under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) in adopting a mitigated negative declaration for the Project rather than preparing an environmental impact report (EIR), because there is substantial evidence that the Project may have significant environmental effects in the areas of aesthetics and hazardous materials. The Neighbors argue further that the City improperly calculated the density bonus to which the Project is entitled under Government Code section 65915, and that the City’s zoning ordinance prohibits the number of parking spaces approved for the Project.

The principal issue is whether opinions that the building is too large to be aesthetically compatible with its surroundings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.