Penoli

People v. Penoli

Bad Law
46 Cal. App. 4th 298·53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 825
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 6, 1996A068547California4,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Bass, Assistant Attorney General,

Laurence C. Sullivan and Aileen Bunney, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KLINE, P.J.

The trial court placed Tiffany Anne Penoli on probation after she pled guilty to possessing methamphetamines. On appeal her attorney filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [ 158 Cal. Rptr. 839 , 600 P.2d 1071 ], requiring this court to independently review the record for arguable error. We directed the parties to brief the following issues: (1) Did the trial court err by adhering to a self-described "standard practice" of requiring, as a condition of probation, a prospective waiver of credit for time spent in residential drug rehabilitation? (2) Did the court delegate excessive judicial authority to the probation department to select a drug rehabilitation program? We have concluded that the first question must be answered affirmatively. Accordingly, we will reverse the order granting probation.

According to the probation report, police were summoned in November 1994 by defendant's sister, who told them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.