In Re Marriage of Braendle

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 574·46 Cal. App. 4th 1037·54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 397·96 Daily Journal DAR 7435·32 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1161
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1996B094105California3,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baron, J.

The parties to this appeal, respondent Dina Braendle and appellant American Overseas Air Freight, Inc., (American Overseas) are both creditors of Ruediger Braendle and have conflicting claims to stock owned by him. We conclude that Dina Braendle holds a prior perfected security interest, and therefore has precedence. We further hold that American Overseas may not recover the debt owed by Ruediger from her or property assigned to her in the marital dissolution. Finally, we hold that the trial court erred in transferring title to the stock to Dina. As secured creditor, Dina was entitled to possession, not title, and must comply with the requirements of division 9 of the California Uniform Commercial Code.

Factual and Procedural Background

The marriage of Dina and Ruediger Braendle was dissolved by judgment entered December 11, 1991. In the division, Ruediger Braendle was awarded the stock in American Overseas, valued at $1,438,651. Dina was awarded certain real and personal property and pension and bank accounts valued at less than the stock. To equalize the division, Ruediger was ordered to pay Dina the sum of $483,393. “Said equalizing payment” was “ordered to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.