David

David v. Abergel

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 611·46 Cal. App. 4th 1281·54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 443·96 Daily Journal DAR 7793·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4849
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 1996B099056California1,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Laurence M. David, M.D., sued R. Patrick Abergel, M.D., for damages in what was essentially a breach of contract action. Abergel answered and cross-complained. Four years later, David and Abergel agreed to arbitrate their disputes and dismiss their lawsuit, and they signed a written agreement for binding arbitration in which they conferred upon the arbitrator (Hon. Lester E. Olson, retired) the power to “grant any remedy or relief to which a party is entitled under California law.” (Italics added.) Following a hearing, the arbitrator issued a 22-page decision denying all relief requested by David, awarding Abergel the sum of $9,335.02 plus interest, and reserving jurisdiction to consider fees, costs and other related matters. Abergel then submitted a motion for sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5, asking for $75,000 in attorneys’ fees and claiming that David’s action was frivolous. Over David’s opposition, the arbitrator granted the motion and awarded $75,000 to Abergel.

Abergel petitioned the trial court for confirmation of the award. Over David’s opposition, the trial court granted the petition as to the actual award in favor of Abergel—but denied it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.