Jordan

Jordan v. City of Santa Barbara

Bad Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 629·46 Cal. App. 4th 1245·54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 340·96 Daily Journal DAR 8028·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4852
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 1996B090198California10,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Appellant landowners filed an action against respondent public agencies claiming that respondents’ activities have increased the salinity of appellants’ groundwater, thereby causing them to suffer crop losses and reduced land value. They also claimed that discharge of effluents into the river by sewage treatment facilities operated by respondents City of Lompoc and Vandenberg Village Community Services District caused excessive growth of vegetation in the river channel which caused potential flood problems. After an eight-week trial, the trial court ruled against appellants on all issues.

Appellants claim the trial court erred in refusing to find that the vegetative blockage of the flood control channel was a nuisance and constituted inverse condemnation, and that respondents’ overpumping has increased the salinity and degraded the aquifers. They further challenge the court’s ruling that respondents’ use and diversion of water were reasonable and not contrary to law. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Procedural History

Appellants own approximately 2,500 acres of agricultural land in the Lompoc plain, some of which is riparian to the Santa Ynez River. Respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.