Ingwerson

California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 593·46 Cal. App. 4th 860·53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 917·96 Daily Journal DAR 7132·152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2621
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1996B092961California7,546 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Donald W. Ingwerson, the Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools (superintendent), and the Los Angeles County Office of Education (county), appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the California and Montebello Teachers Associations (the unions). The unions filed a mandate petition to compel the superintendent and the county to develop and adopt a fiscal plan and budget for the Montebello Unified School District (the district) for the 1994-1995 school year which did not include a reduction in pay or freezing of salary schedule step and column increases for certified employees. The trial court granted the unions’ petition. We reverse the judgment.

II. Background

On January 30, 1995, the unions filed a mandamus petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1085, for the benefit of members of the unit of certified employees that they represent as the exclusive representative in the district. The petition sought a peremptory writ of mandate ordering the superintendent and the county to immediately develop and adopt a fiscal plan and budget for the district for the 1994-1995 school year.

The petition alleged the county had the legal duty and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.