Bezenek

Thrifty-Tel, Inc. v. Bezenek

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 624·46 Cal. App. 4th 1559·54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 468·96 Daily Journal DAR 7831·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4933
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 1996G013917California4,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

A telephone long-distance carrier prevailed on fraud and conversion theories against Myron and Susan Bezenek—whose teenage sons employed computer technology in their efforts to crack plaintiff’s access and authorization codes and make long distance phone calls without paying for them—gamering a judgment, including attorney fees, just shy of $50,000. Defendants challenge the court’s determination that causes of action for fraud and conversion lie on these facts and complain of plaintiff’s failure to mitigate and prove damages. They also contend that the court erred in calculating damages based on the company’s own tariff on file with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Finally, defendants argue Civil Code section 1714.1 precludes damages based on conduct by a minor who is not their child and, in any event, limits damages to no more than $10,000.

I

Thrifty-Tel, Inc., provides long-distance telephone services. Subscribers’ telephones are programmed with a confidential access code and a six-digit authorization code that directs calls into Thrifty-Tel’s computerized switching network. An unauthorized user who knows both an access and an authorization code can make…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.