People v. Miller

Caution
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 551·46 Cal. App. 4th 412·53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 773·96 Daily Journal DAR 6869·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 1996E015373California5,411 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

A jury convicted Eric Hunter of conspiracy to commit willful, deliberate and premeditated murder with malice aforethought (Pen. Code, § 182) and Larry Eugene Miller of accessory after the fact (Pen. Code, § 32), as a lesser included offense of conspiracy to commit willful, deliberate and premeditated murder with malice aforethought. In bifurcated proceedings, the trial court found that each defendant had committed his crime for the benefit of a street gang. (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) Both were sentenced to prison and appeal. Miller contends that his postarrest statements and the recordation of a witness’s past recollection should not have been admitted. Hunter joins him in this latter argument. Miller also contends that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct. We reject all these contentions and affirm Miller’s conviction. Hunter additionally contends that the jury was misinstructed as to the offense for which he was convicted. We agree with Hunter that the jury was misinstructed and therefore reverse his conviction, which moots his remaining contentions about another jury instruction error and insufficiency of the evidence as to the enhancement. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.