Cristler

Cristler v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc.

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 4th 72·3 Cal. WCC 32
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2009D050719California6,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

James W. Cristler, John Purves, James G. Harrod, Sydney Moroff and Mark Lambert, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons (collectively Cristler), sued a parcel delivery company, Express Messenger Systems, Inc., doing business as California Overnight (Express Messenger). The lawsuit contained a number of causes of action, all based on a core contention that Express Messenger improperly classified its employees as independent contractors. The case was litigated before a jury and, with respect to certain claims, a trial court. Express Messenger prevailed.

Cristler appeals, contending that the trial court erred in a number of respects. Cristler argues that the trial court (i) abused its discretion by failing to amend the class definition in light of developments subsequent to class certification; (ii) erred in instructing the jury as to both the burden of proof and with respect to the pertinent classification factors that distinguish employees from independent contractors; (iii) applied incorrect legal standards in adjudicating Cristler’s unfair and unlawful business practices causes of action; (iv) abused its discretion by allowing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.