People v. Chue Vang

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 4th 1120·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 312·90 Cal. Rptr. 3d 328
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2009C058020California3,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

An information accused defendant Chue Vang of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (b)(1) (lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14, accomplished by force, duress, or menace), on or about and between April 15, 2003, and December 31, 2004; the alleged victim was his niece A., aged six at the time of the offense. After trial, a jury convicted defendant of this offense. The trial court sentenced defendant to a state prison term of six years (the middle term).

Defendant contends; (1) The trial court denied defendant his rights to due process, fundamental fairness, and confrontation under the federal and state Constitutions when it found A. competent to testify. (2) The trial court deprived defendant of due process and a fair trial under the federal and state Constitutions by giving the jury the standard instruction on witness credibility (CALCRIM No. 226) and refusing defendant’s proposed modification, which would have told the jury that it could reject A.’s account if she testified inaccurately even though she did not deliberately lie. (3) The trial court deprived defendant of due process, a fair trial, and the right to present a defense when it refused to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.