Hopkins

People v. Hopkins

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 4th 305·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·89 Cal. Rptr. 3d 744
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 2009E045671California1,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

Defendant Eric Eugene Hopkins appeals from an order denying his motion for return of property following the prosecution’s dismissal of marijuana-related charges because the marijuana was legally possessed under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5.)

BACKGROUND

Defendant was charged with transportation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11360, subd. (a)), and possession of more than 28.5 grams of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (c)), in a felony complaint. On March 26, 2008, criminal charges were dismissed on motion of the prosecutor. On April 14, 2008, defendant made a nonstatutory motion for return of property. The basis for the motion was that the marijuana had been legally possessed pursuant to the Compassionate Use Act. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5.) On April 17, 2008, the motion was denied. Defendant appealed.

DISCUSSION

At his request, this court appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 600 P.2d 1071 ] and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 493 , 87 S.Ct. 1386 ], setting forth a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.