HealthMarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 4th 1160·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 301·90 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2009B211881California4,687 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

HealthMarkets, Inc. (HealthMarkets), challenges the denial of its motion to quash service of summons based on lack of personal jurisdiction. HealthMarkets is a nonresident holding company and has no contacts with the State of California. Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of Tennessee (Mid-West) is a subsidiary of a subsidiary of HealthMarkets. The trial court concluded that Mid-West’s contacts with this state should be attributed to HealthMarkets for purposes of specific personal jurisdiction. We conclude that specific personal jurisdiction over a parent company based on the activities of its subsidiary or sub-subsidiary is appropriate only if the parent purposefully directed those activities at this state. Absent evidence that HealthMarkets purposefully directed the activities of Mid-West toward this state, we conclude that there is no basis for personal jurisdiction over HealthMarkets and that the motion to quash must be granted.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

HealthMarkets is a holding company incorporated in the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in the State of Texas. HealthMarkets, LLC, is its subsidiary. Mid-West is a subsidiary of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.