CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. State

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 4th 1183·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 302·90 Cal. Rptr. 3d 501
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2009C055700California12,505 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

The Legislature recently amended the law with respect to reimbursement to local governments for costs imposed as a result of ballot measures. The amended statute provides that the state need not provide reimbursement if “[t]he statute or executive order imposes duties that are necessary to implement, reasonably within the scope of, or expressly included in, a ballot measure approved by the voters in a statewide or local election. . . .” (Gov. Code, § 17556, subd. (f).) The Legislature also directed the Commission on State Mandates to set aside or reconsider specific test claims decisions that were issued before the amendment of the statute.

In this case, we must determine whether the Legislature’s direction to the commission to redecide cases that were already final violated the separation of powers doctrine. We conclude that such direction exceeds the Legislature’s power.

We also must determine whether the amended statute is consistent with article XIII B, section 6 of the California Constitution, which requires the state to reimburse local governments for certain costs imposed on the local governments by the Legislature and state agencies. We conclude that, to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.