Samura

Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Caution
17 Cal. App. 4th 1284·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 846·22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 20·93 Daily Journal DAR 10621·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6186
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 1993Docket Nos. A055730, A057515California6,776 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

The Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., the Permanente Medical Group, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (hereafter Health Plan or Kaiser) appeal a judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court requiring extensive changes in the third party liability provision in service agreements with members. The theories alleged in the original complaint, filed by the plaintiff, Arthur Bradley Samura, on November 20, 1985, were greatly expanded in a first amended complaint filed about three and one-half years later. This amended complaint states a multifaceted legal challenge to the third party liability provision, together with associated administrative practices, and seeks injunctive relief on behalf of Samura and other Health Plan members similarly situated pursuant to Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17203.

Following trial, the court issued an order on May 31, 1991, granting the relief that is the subject of this appeal. At Health Plan’s request, it subsequently delivered a statement of decision clarifying the legal basis for the order. The provisions of the order were incorporated in a judgment, filed on October 10, 1991, from which Kaiser now appeals. Samura…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.