Yee

Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 4th 1097·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 825·23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1·93 Daily Journal DAR 10309·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6027
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1993Docket Nos. D016072, D016083California4,658 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs John and Irene Yee, owners of two contiguous mobilehome parks in the City of Escondido (the City) subject to rent control, appeal the denial of their petitions for writ of mandate seeking to invalidate the City’s decision authorizing only a $27.50 increase in rents. We conclude that the decision of the Escondido Mobilehome Rental Review Board (the Board) is not supported by substantial evidence and hence the judgment must be reversed and file matter remanded to the Board for reconsideration.

To aid the Board on remand we note the following. While the Board purported to follow the fair “return on equity” approach to determine the Yees’ claim for increased rents, it appears to have committed a serious error by failing to account for interest payments on the encumbering loans in determining the income (or loss) resulting from operation of the parks. In attempting to justify the Board’s result on appeal by means of a different theory, the City improperly treats property appreciation and tax shelter benefits as imputed income in assessing the Yees’ total return on their investment. On remand, however, the Board would not be precluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.