Holmes
Holmes v. General Dynamics Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
Wiener, J.
In October 1984 defendant General Dynamics (GD) terminated plaintiff Randall Holmes, a 13-year management employee. Finding GD fired Holmes in violation of public policy by retaliating against him for disclosing to management the company’s violation of the false statements act ( 18 U.S.C. § 1001 ), a jury determined Holmes was entitled to $106,000 for lost wages and benefits, $200,000 for emotional distress and $500,000 in punitive damages. GD appeals, asserting the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment and instructional error. Holmes cross-appeals, contending the court erred in refusing his request for prejudgment interest pursuant to Civil Code section 3291. We affirm the judgment.
Factual Background
In 1971 GD hired Holmes as a management systems specialist in its electronics division (GDE), which builds and repairs electronic warfare, surveillance and navigation systems, and supplies electronics used by other GD divisions. Holmes thereafter received numerous raises, honors, awards, and promotions. In July 1982 GDE’s comptroller, Claude Stoker, made Holmes GDE’s business management manager, a position of increased responsibility. In this position, Holmes…