Accardi

Accardi v. SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA CTY.

Caution
17 Cal. App. 4th 341·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 755·21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 292·93 Daily Journal DAR 9410·58 Cal. Comp. Cases 431
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 1993B072215California3,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Sexual harassment does not necessarily involve sexual conduct. It need not have anything to do with lewd acts, double entendres or sexual advances. Sexual harassment may involve conduct, whether blatant or subtle, that discriminates against a person solely because of that person’s sex.

In this writ proceeding, we hold that sexual harassment occurs when an employer creates a hostile environment for an employee because of that employee’s sex. We also hold that a claim for sexual harassment is not time-barred when there are continuous acts of discrimination over a period of time provided that some of those acts fall within the limitations period. We further hold that a claim of emotional distress arising out of sexual harassment is not preempted by workers’ compensation law.

Petitioner, Debbra J. Accardi, was at one time employed as a police officer with the City of Simi Valley. On October 11, 1991, she filed sexual discrimination complaints with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). On October 17, 1991, Accardi obtained a “right to sue letter” from DFEH. On March 13, 1992, she filed a lawsuit against real parties, the City of Simi Valley, James…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.