Ultramar, Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 4th 689·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 790·21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 608·93 Daily Journal DAR 9835·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5796
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 1993B068366California6,998 words

Opinion

Opinion

Masterson, J.

Ultramar, Inc., and South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) each appeal from portions of a judgment. Therein, the trial court upheld AQMD’s power to issue a regulation challenged by Ultramar, but found that AQMD had violated a provision of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.; hereafter CEQA) relating to a 30-day public comment period on an environmental assessment (EA). We conclude the trial court was correct in both respects and therefore affirm the judgment.

Background

Hydrogen fluoride (HE) is a colorless, fuming gas or liquid acid. In concentrated form, it is used by oil refineries as a catalyst in the production of high-octane gasoline. HE is a toxic air contaminant. Refineries that do not use HE use sulfuric acid as a substitute.

In March 1988, AQMD formed a task force to study the hazards of HE use. The task force submitted a report to the governing board of AQMD on March 29, 1990. A summary of the minutes from the April 6, 1990, meeting of the governing board of AQMD states that the board passed a motion to adopt its staffs recommendation “that the storage and use of large quantities of HE be phased out by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.