Peel

People v. Peel

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 4th 594·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 782·21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 449·93 Daily Journal DAR 9794·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5765
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 1993F017765California1,715 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

Defendant, Donald E. Peel, was charged with attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187), possession or explosion of a destructive device (§ 12303.3), assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), and possession of materials with the intent to make a destructive device (§ 12312). It was also alleged he personally used a firearm in the commission of the offenses charged in counts 2 and 3. Pursuant to a negotiated plea, he pled guilty to counts 2, 3, and 4; count 1 and the use allegation were dismissed.

The court sentenced defendant to the middle term of five years on count 2; it stayed a middle term of three years on count 3 (§ 654); and it imposed a middle term of three years on count 4 to run concurrently.

On appeal, defendant asserts several sentencing errors. He contends the trial court erred by failing to (1) state its reasons for imposing the middle terms; (2) consider his alcohol and drug abuse as mitigating factors; (3) recommend he participate in a substance abuse counseling or education program while imprisoned; and (4) consider or recommend referral to the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC).

Factual and Procedural History

In the early morning hours of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.