Sehlmeyer

Sehlmeyer v. Department of General Services

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 4th 1072·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 821·21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 840·93 Daily Journal DAR 10253·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6006
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1993B066001California3,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

We hold in this case that an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued to obtain a third party witness’s personal records must be preceded by notice to the witness.

Facts

Ellen Sehlmeyer complained to the Board of Psychology of the State of California about Craig Stempf, a licensed clinical psychologist. The board initiated disciplinary action against Stempf and a hearing was set before an administrative law judge (acting under the auspices of the Department of General Services of the State of California). In anticipation of the hearing, Stempf served 17 or more subpoenas duces tecum on Sehlmeyer’s past and present physicians and psychotherapists and her former attorneys. Copies of the subpoenas were served on the board but no notice of any kind was given to Sehlmeyer. The records were produced to the ALJ at a prehearing conference and the ALJ gave them to Stempf s attorney.

When Sehlmeyer discovered the disclosure, she filed a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the Department of General Services to quash the subpoenas and return the documents. The Board of Psychology (as one real party in interest) did not oppose the petition and disclaimed any interest in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.