Rosenbloom

Rosenbloom v. Honour Corp.

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 829·66 Cal. App. 4th 1477·78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 686·98 Daily Journal DAR 10477·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7569
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1998G019278California1,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sonenshine, J.

Steven Rosenbloom appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Hanour Corporation, doing business as, the Shark Club (the Club), in his personal injury action.

I

Reef Systems, Inc. (Reef) built and maintained a shark aquarium for the Club. After a shark outgrew its tank, the Club hired Reef to move it. Richard Barbosa, a Reef principal, brought along his employee, Rosenbloom, to help with the endeavor. Barbosa told Rosenbloom to drain the aquarium. Once this was completed, Barbosa directed Rosenbloom to take off his shoes, enter the tank and grab the shark by its tail as Barbosa held its head. Rosenbloom complied, and as the two began lifting the shark, it suddenly thrashed about. Barbosa let go and the shark spun around, biting Rosenbloom’s arm.

Rosenbloom filed the underlying suit alleging negligence and strict liability; The Club moved for summary judgment, maintaining Rosenbloom’s causes of action were barred under the assumption of the risk doctrine. Rosenbloom requested a continuance, claiming he needed time to take the scheduled depositions of two critical experts who, Rosenbloom claimed, would reveal triable issues of fact necessary to defeat the Club’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.