Lockwood

People v. Lockwood

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 734·66 Cal. App. 4th 222·77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 769·98 Daily Journal DAR 9073·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6566
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 21, 1998A079845California2,578 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. Introduction

Ashley Chad Lockwood (appellant) appeals from an order denying his application for a certificate of rehabilitation pursuant to Penal Code section 4852.01. We find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s application, but the application was improperly denied with prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm, but remand with instructions to correct the order to deny the application without prejudice.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant was convicted of his first felony, vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851), in February 1978. In March 1982, after appellant successfully completed probation, the conviction was dismissed. (§ 1203.4.) On March 30, 1984, the court granted appellant’s petition for a certificate of rehabilitation and pardon. (§ 4852.01 et seq.)

In June and July 1990, appellant was convicted of grand theft (§ 487, former subd. 1) and carrying a loaded firearm (§ 12025, subd. (a)). After appellant again successfully completed probation, these convictions were dismissed in July 1993. (§ 1203.4.)

On November 5, 1996, appellant filed a petition for a second certificate of rehabilitation with the.Sonoma County Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.