RODOLA

People v. RODOLA

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 836·66 Cal. App. 4th 1505·78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 735·98 Daily Journal DAR 10540·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7601
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1998E021039California819 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of first degree burglary in violation of Penal Code section 459. Defendant subsequently admitted that he had suffered seven prior “strike” convictions (§§ 667, subds. (c) and (e), 1170.12, subd. (c)), three prior serious felony convictions (§ 667, subd. (a)), and four prison priors (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). Defendant was sentenced to state prison for a total indeterminate term of 40 years to life. This was composed of a term of twenty-five years to life under the “Three Strikes” law and five years for each of the three prior serious felony convictions. Defendant appeals on three separate grounds.

Statement of Facts

The facts are not in dispute. On December 22, 1996, defendant was caught in the act of burglarizing a residence. A woman observed defendant go into her neighbor’s backyard. She called the police who apprehended defendant while he was walking away from the rear of the house. A police officer advised defendant of his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [ 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , 10 A.L.R.3d 974 ]. Defendant waived those rights and admitted that he planned to burglarize the residence. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.