Coltrain

Coltrain v. Shewalter

Good Law
66 Cal. App. 4th 94·77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1998E019258California5,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

Plaintiffs Darlene Coltrain and Arthur R. Coltrain, Jr. (collectively the Coltrains) own and manage Victory Apartments, an apartment complex in downtown Riverside. Defendants Suzette Camacho, Marcos Dominguez, Mike Gorman, David McNiel, Sara Rundle, Clint Shewalter, Kim Shewalter, Theresa Skinner, and Kathleen Smartt (collectively defendants) live in and/or own homes in the neighborhood of Victory Apartments.

Defendants claimed Victory Apartments was a center for drug dealing and other crimes in their community. Each defendant filed a separate nuisance abatement action against the Coltrains in small claims court. (See generally, Lew v. Superior Court (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 866 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 42 ].) The Coltrains responded by filing this action against defendants for defamation, trade libel, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Defendants, volleying back, claimed this was a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP); they filed a special motion to strike plaintiffs’ complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (sometimes the SLAPP statute). The Coltrains responded by dismissing their complaint.

Defendants, finding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.