Venturi

Venturi v. Taylor

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 472·35 Cal. App. 4th 16·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 272·95 Daily Journal DAR 6608·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3860
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 1995B084425California3,849 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

We hold, in the published portion of this opinion, that a potential creditor with actual notice of the pendency of estate proceedings cannot excuse the untimely filing of a creditor’s claim on the ground that the administrator failed to send a formal notice of administration of the estate, as required by Probate Code section 9050.

Daniel S. Venturi (hereinafter appellant) appeals from a judgment entered following grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jerrie L. Taylor and Joan McGarry, co-administrators of the estate of Gordon Mueller, deceased, (hereinafter respondents.) Respondents, in their representative capacities, cross-appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney fees as sanctions.

Appellant asserts that because the requirements of sections 9050-9054 regarding notice to creditors are mandatory, the time to file a creditor’s claim does not commence to run until the personal representative of the estate serves a formal notice of administration of the estate upon the known creditors. [[/]] * We affirm both the judgment and the order.

Facts

Gordon Mueller died intestate May 8, 1991, at age 56. Letters of administration were issued to respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.