Greathouse

Greathouse v. Amcord, Inc.

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 521·35 Cal. App. 4th 831·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 561·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4275
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1995A064942California3,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

On September 22, 1988, the surviving wife and five children of Henry Greathouse (hereafter plaintiffs) filed a complaint against a lengthy series of defendants, including Amcord, Inc., doing business as Riverside Cement Company (hereafter Riverside), to recover damages for his death from asbestos-related disease. Before or during trial plaintiffs settled for a total sum of $284,000 with 19 of the 20 defendants that were actually served. The case was submitted to the jury only as to the liability of Riverside, the one remaining defendant. In a special verdict, the jury awarded plaintiffs $289,174.10 in economic damages and $100,000 in non-economic damages. On the issue of comparative fault, the jury assigned 2 percent of the fault to Riverside and another 2 percent to the decedent. In a posttrial motion, the trial court granted Riverside a setoff of $56,800 against the verdict to reflect the portion of the pretrial settlement representing payment for economic damages.

The decedent, Henry Greathouse (hereafter Henry), moved to Stockton, California in 1944, a few years after his marriage to Emma Greathouse. In 1947 he began working as an apprentice hod carrier—the term…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.