FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
35 Cal. App. 4th 69·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 404
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1995B088501California3,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fogel, Feldman, Ostrov, Ringler & Klevens, Larry R. Feldman, Lester G. Ostrov and Richard L. Rosett for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

TURNER, P.J.

Defendants, FSR Brokerage, Inc., doing business as Fred Sands Realtors (Sands), Prichett Realty Corp. (Prichett), and Gary Marquis, seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to enter summary judgment on consolidated personal injury and wrongful death complaints of 36 plaintiffs. The consolidated complaints were filed as a result of the collapse of a balcony on an oceanfront residence in Malibu on November 15, 1992. Based on the facts set forth in the parties' papers, the aforementioned defendants, realtors who were involved in the sale of the oceanfront residence where the tragic collapse occurred, are entitled to summary judgment because they owe no legal duty to any of the injured parties. Further, we conclude the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h) [1] so as to permit additional use of the discovery process.

The present case involves 29 consolidated actions. The earliest original complaint was filed on December 10, 1992. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.