Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 496·35 Cal. App. 4th 604·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 342·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4071
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1995B077117California5,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Ford Motor Company appeals from an order to dismiss entered after defendants’ motions to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens were granted.

Procedural and Factual Background

At approximately the same time, in November 1992, plaintiff filed four actions in which it sought to establish its right to insurance coverage for liabilities arising from the environmental contamination of various plant sites. In addition to the instant action, which sought a declaration of rights as to three California sites, plaintiff filed two actions in New Jersey and one in Kentucky (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (Cir. Ct. Bullitt County, Ky., 1992, No. 92-CI-0619)). At issue in the Kentucky action are three environmentally contaminated sites located in that state. At issue in Ford Motor Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (Super. Ct. Middlesex County, N.J., 1992, No. L-11463-92) are four sites located in New Jersey and a site located in Ohio. Ford Electronics & Refrigeration Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America (Super. Ct. Camden County, N.J., 1992, No. L-11640-92) concerns two third party waste disposal sites in New Jersey and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.