Huntley

Huntley v. Foster

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 505·35 Cal. App. 4th 753·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 358·95 Daily Journal DAR 7023·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4127
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 1, 1995B085870California1,109 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A party in a personal injury action intends to have her treating doctor testify as to her injuries, treatment, and prognosis. Must she provide opposing counsel an expert witness declaration required by Code of Civil Procedure section 2034, subdivision (a)(2) for retained experts? No.

A treating doctor is not a retained expert for purposes of section 2034.

Plaintiff Cynthia Lynn Huntley appeals a stipulated judgment, agreed to by the parties after the trial court precluded Huntley’s treating chiropractor and podiatrist from testifying as expert witnesses. We reverse.

Facts

On June 20, 1991, plaintiff Cynthia Lynn Huntley and defendants Antoinette Foster and Russell Trubia were in an automobile collision on Surfside Drive in Port Hueneme. Huntley suffered personal injuries to her neck, back, wrist and ankle. She brought this negligence action against Foster and Trubia (collectively referred to as Foster). The trial court referred the lawsuit to an arbitrator for hearing. After the arbitrator held a hearing and ruled favorably for Huntley, Foster sought a trial de novo in the superior court.

The parties each served a demand for expert witness information upon the other.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.