Saelee

People v. Saelee

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 429·35 Cal. App. 4th 27·40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 790·95 Daily Journal DAR 5982·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3503
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 1995F020476California1,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dibiaso, J.

Appellant Nai Ian Saelee was convicted of various crimes, including first degree murder. Included in his sentence was a restitution fine under Government Code section 13967 in the amount of $10,000. We publish the brief portion of this opinion which addresses the ex post facto implications of Government Code section 13967 as applied to the circumstances of this case. Ultimately, we will modify the judgment to reduce the fine to the pertinent statutory minimum and affirm the judgment as so modified.

Statement of the Case

On May 7, 1993, a first amended consolidated information was filed in Fresno County Superior Court, charging appellant Nai Ian Saelee with murder (Pen. Code, § 187, count one); attempted murder (§§ 664/187, count two); and assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2), count three). As to counts one and two, it was further alleged that Saelee was armed with a firearm in the commission of the offense (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). Saelee pleaded not guilty and denied the special allegations.

Jury trial began on August 30, 1993. On September 8, Saelee was convicted of first degree murder (count one), attempted premeditated murder (count two), and assault with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.