People v. $20,110 US CURRENCY

Good Law
151 Cal. App. 4th 1022·60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 554
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2007B191821California1,495 words

Opinion

Opinion

Health and Safety Code section 11488.4 is a civil forfeiture statute. [1] It allows authorities to seize assets related to criminal activities.

Inexplicably, the statute's requirements differ radically depending upon whether the value or sum seized is more or less than $25,000. Our opinion sheds no light on the reason for this distinction. The opinion will, we hope, explain why the forfeiture of $20,110 was not proper here.

Ricky C. Hill appeals a judgment of forfeiture of $20,110 currency found during execution of a search warrant in his residence. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On August 18, 2005, Hill filed a claim asserting an interest in $20,110 currency that was seized during a law enforcement search of his residence. On August 29, 2005, the district attorney filed a petition instituting a civil action for forfeiture of the currency pursuant to section 11488.4.

Pending the hearing, Hill filed a substitution of attorney form stating that his former attorney no longer represented him, and that he was representing himself.

The trial court held a hearing upon the matter on March 8 and 20, 2006. Neither Hill nor an attorney on his behalf…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.