Duff

People v. Duff

Good Law
151 Cal. App. 4th 913·60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2007G036562California1,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendant James Edward Duff, Jr., appeals the trial court's decision to deny him presentence conduct credits. He argues that because his sentence for murder was stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654, [1] the statute denying presentence conduct credits to those convicted of murder does not apply to him. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Given the limited nature of defendant's appeal, we need not detail the facts of the case. Defendant was convicted of second degree murder (Pen.Code, § 187, subd (a)) and assault on a child with force likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 273ab). The trial court sentenced defendant to 25 years to life in state prison on the section 273ab count, and stayed a sentence of 15 years to life on the second degree murder count under section 654. Defendant was awarded credit for 567 days actually served, but the court denied him presentence conduct credits.

Defendant claims he should have been awarded conduct credit pursuant to section 2933.1 (15 percent of his actual days in custody, thus adding 85 days of conduct credit to his 567 days actually served). He argues that because the sentence for second degree murder was stayed under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.