Quartz of Southern California, Inc. v. Mullen Bros.

Good Law
151 Cal. App. 4th 901·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 885·61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 54·63 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 417·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6300
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2007G036228, G036343California3,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

Quartz of Southern California, Inc. (Quartz), sold certain vehicles to a used car dealer, who sold the vehicles to consumers under conditional sale contracts. The dealer sold the contracts to Mullen Bros., Inc. (Mullen), a finance company, which paid the dealer in full. The dealer went out of business and failed to pay Quartz for the vehicles, so Quartz retained the title certificates. In these cross-actions between Quartz and Mullen, the trial court issued a declaration that Quartz is the lawful owner of the title certificates but refused to order Mullen to pay Quartz' for the certificates. Both Quartz and Mullen appeal.

We affirm that portion of the judgment declaring Quartz to be the lawful owner of the title certificates. However, we reverse the portion awarding no money to Quartz; we remand to the trial court for a calculation of the amount Mullen owes to Quartz.

FACTS

Most of the facts in this case are undisputed. Quartz, doing business as Quartz Dealer Direct, is a licensed wholesale used auto auction. It acquires vehicles from licensed dealers and sells them to other licensed dealers at an auction sale. Quartz’s practice is to accept vehicles from the selling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.