Appel

People v. Appel

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1135·51 Cal. App. 4th 495·59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 216·96 Daily Journal DAR 14604·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8828
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1996B097113California3,463 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Frederick John Appel was charged with knowingly discharging pollutants into the waters of the United States between May 10, 1992, and December 23, 1994. (Wat. Code, § 13387, subd. (a)(4).) A jury found him guilty.

On appeal he contends that his conviction was unconstitutional to the extent that it relied on acts occurring prior to an April of 1994 jurisdictional determination; that federal law provides for no criminal penalties and preempts California law; that he was denied due process because he had no prior opportunity to challenge the jurisdictional determination; that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to apply the “converted cropland” exception as a defense; and that he was denied due process by the prosecution’s failure to bring the charge until after floods washed away evidence. We affirm.

Facts

Appel owns a parcel of property of approximately 30 acres. The Ventura River runs through the center of the property and also at its western boundary. San Antonio Creek comes through a comer of the property and empties into the Ventura River. The Ventura River is typical of Southern California rivers. It has a “braided” system of channels within a broad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.