Llamas

People v. Llamas

Bad Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 27·51 Cal. App. 4th 1729·60 Cal. Rptr. 2d 357·97 Daily Journal DAR 655·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 437
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 1997Docket Nos. D024368, D026009California4,600 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Appellant Frankie Llamas was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance while armed with a firearm, vehicle taking, receiving stolen property, possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a controlled substance. He appeals, arguing insufficient evidence of auto taking, receiving stolen property and possession of a firearm by a felon, error in the preclusion of a defense witness, in the denial of his Marsden motion and in the response given to a jury question. He further claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant filed a companion petition for writ of habeas corpus, claiming ineffective assistance which we consider with the appeal.

Facts

A. Prosecution Case

In late January 1995, Irma Llamas and her husband, appellant, argued over his taking her 1994 gray Nissan. Appellant took the car without permission and Irma filed a stolen vehicle report.

In the early morning hours of February 1, 1995, Officer Michael Walden drove to Tamarindo Way in Chula Vista in response to the report of a possible auto theft in progress. At the location, Walden stopped, got out of his vehicle and approached a gray Nissan parked on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.