Morris

Morris v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 350·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 869·2000 Daily Journal DAR 12123·84 Cal. App. 4th 1026·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9135
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2000D034493California909 words

Opinion

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

In this insurance coverage dispute, Randy Morris, as the assignee of certain rights of Carmela Rincon Loelkes under her real estate agents and brokers professional liability policy, sued Employers Reinsurance Corporation (Employers) for breach of contract for failure to indemnify and defend Loelkes. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Employers, concluding that Loelkes’s policy did not provide coverage, based on an exclusion in the policy relating to property owned by the broker.

Morris appeals, contending the court erred in ruling that the ownership exclusion applied to the facts in this case. We agree and reverse the judgment. We express no opinion regarding whether any other exclusions in the policy might apply to preclude coverage.

Facts and Prior Proceedings

In 1988, Loelkes represented Koichi Shimazaki, the owner of a parcel of undeveloped real property, as his listing and selling agent for the property. Loelkes also represented Morris, a prospective buyer, and on December 17, 1988, on behalf of Morris, she presented an offer to purchase Shimazaki’s property. Shimazaki, through Loelkes, responded with a counteroffer. Morris maintains he told…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.