Hassoldt

Hassoldt v. Patrick Media Group, Inc.

Bad Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 662·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 793·2000 Daily Journal DAR 11191·84 Cal. App. 4th 153·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 2000B113905California6,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schneider, J.

I

Factual Background

Plaintiffs and appellants Judy and William Hassoldt (the Hassoldts) own a piece of property in Redondo Beach, on which they operate a preschool called Der Kindergarden. The Hassoldts established a trust (the Yankee Trust), which owns the land and leases it to Der Kindergarden, Inc., a corporation. Neither Der Kindergarden, Inc., nor the Yankee Trust is a party to this litigation.

Defendant and appellant Patrick Media Group, Inc. (Patrick), is an outdoor advertising company. In September of 1986, it purchased the assets and some of the liabilities of another outdoor advertising company, Foster & Kleiser.

In October 1992, a tree located on the Hassoldts’ property was severely trimmed. When William Hassoldt discovered the tree had been trimmed, he contacted Daniel Voorhees, the employee of Patrick in charge of Patrick’s tree-cutting activities. Ultimately, Patrick denied it was responsible for cutting the tree. The Hassoldts suspected Patrick had trimmed the tree on their property to better expose its outdoor billboard.

The Hassoldts filed a complaint against Patrick which contained multiple causes of action. The gravamen of the Hassoldts’ complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.