Hurvitz

Hurvitz v. Hoefflin

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 558·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 888·2000 D.A.R. 12·2000 Daily Journal DAR 12327·84 Cal. App. 4th 1232
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 2000B130805California4,136 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

In this case we hold an order by the trial court sealing certain court documents and barring disclosure of certain information, whether obtained through discovery or otherwise, is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech.

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal arises from a daisy chain of litigation among Dr. Steven M. Hoefflin, a cosmetic surgeon whose patients included many celebrities, and several of his former employees and associates. Appellant Dr. James S. Hurvitz is also a cosmetic surgeon, and had a business relationship with Hoefflin until the two reached a parting of the ways in 1996. Hurvitz filed suit against Hoefflin and his medical corporation, alleging causes of action for breach of contract and various torts, including misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and slander per se. Hoefflin denied the allegations and filed a cross-complaint against Hurvitz and his wife, appellant Jackie Hurvitz, alleging various business torts on the part of the Hurvitzes.

Also in 1996, four members of Hoefflin’s administrative and medical staff, Barbara Maywood, Kim Moore-Mestas, Lydia Benjamin and Donna Burton (former employees), filed a lawsuit against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.