Sheehy

Sheehy v. Franchise Tax Board

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 760·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 809·2000 Daily Journal DAR 11375·84 Cal. App. 4th 280·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8557
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2000G021719California961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Plaintiffs Patrick F. and Arlene Sheehy appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant Franchise Tax Board (Board) in an action alleging that the Board assessed usurious interest on unpaid taxes. Because the penalty assessment for late payment of taxes is neither an assessment to compensate the state for a loan nor for a forbearance, we affirm the judgment.

Facts

Plaintiffs claimed a deduction for an embezzlement and theft loss on their 1985 state income tax return. Six years later, defendant notified plaintiffs the deduction was disallowed, and subsequently informed plaintiffs they owed $7,074 in additional taxes. Defendant also assessed $5,717 in interest up to that date; the interest was computed at a rate of 10 percent compounded daily. Defendant ultimately collected the $7,074 in taxes and $10,179 in interest. Plaintiffs then sued defendant, alleging that the amount of interest charged on the unpaid taxes violated article XV, section 1 of the California Constitution, which limits interest to 7 percent per year. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Discussion

The Legislature authorizes defendant to assess…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.