Thompson

Thompson v. Mercury Casualty Company

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 596·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 788·2000 Daily Journal DAR 11107·84 Cal. App. 4th 90·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8373
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 2000E025722California2,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

1. Introduction

Mercury Casualty Company’s (Mercury) automobile liability insurance policy contains a provision, “Condition 23,” that limits coverage to the statutorily required minimums for persons using the car with the named insured’s permission. In this declaratory relief action, the trial court found Condition 23 inconspicuous as a matter of law. On appeal, we agree with the trial court and affirm.

2. Factual and Procedural History

For purposes of this declaratory relief action, the parties stipulated to the underlying facts.

At the time of the accident, John Hughlett and Carmen Hughlett had a Mercury automobile liability insurance policy for their Chevrolet S-10 pickup truck. After increasing their policy limits, the new bodily injury liability limits were $100,000 per person up to $300,000 per accident. On the first page, the policy included the following language:

On the sixth and last page, Condition 23 provided: “23. Permissive User Coverage — Coverages A and B: If this policy provides coverage with bodily injury liability limits in excess of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident and/or a property damage liability limit in excess of $5,000 per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.