Ivy Trucking, Inc. v. Creston Brandon Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
Gaut, J.
Plaintiff Ivy Trucking, Inc. (Ivy), appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants Heritage Engineering Construction, Inc. (Heritage), Vigilant Insurance Company (Vigilant), and Ulico Casualty Company (Ulico).
Ivy was hired by a subcontractor, Creston Brandon Corporation (Creston Brandon), to haul fill dirt to a Caltrans (Department of Transportation) freeway project under construction by Heritage, the general contractor. The trial court denied Ivy recovery based on the general rule of long standing that one who transports construction materials to a building site cannot assert a mechanic’s lien because the transportation services are not labor or materials. (Wilson v. Nugent (1899) 125 Cal. 280, 284 [ 57 P. 1008 ], citing Adams v. Burbank (1894) 103 Cal. 646, 651 [ 37 P. 640 ].)
We reverse the judgment, relying on an equally venerable exception to the general rule, an exception that applies when the transportation services are rendered under contract with a statutory agent of the owner. (Civ. Code, § 3110 ; McClain v. Hutton (1900) 131 Cal. 132, 142-143 [ 63 P. 182 ].)
1. Factual and Procedural Background