LaMonte

LaMonte v. Sanwa Bank California

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 431·45 Cal. App. 4th 509·52 Cal. Rptr. 2d 861·96 Daily Journal DAR 5563·29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1263
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 1996B070428California5,539 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Plaintiff LaMonte appeals from judgment of nonsuit entered in favor of defendant Sanwa Bank California (Sanwa) in LaMonte’s action against Sanwa for allegedly wrongfully handling checks payable to her. LaMonte contends that at trial she presented substantial evidence to permit the jury to determine her claims for breach of fiduciary duty and/or conversion.

Factual and Procedural Background

In March 1990, LaMonte filed the instant action against Sanwa, asserting numerous causes of action arising out of her allegations that she inherited a 6.5 percent interest in 34,000 acres of real property in Northern California, known as Howard Properties, which generated oil and mineral royalties and other income to its owners; in 1978, the owners of Howard Properties entered into an oral agreement with Sanwa whereby Sanwa was to serve as the collecting and disbursing agent for the various Howard Properties owners; between January 1984 and April 1985, Sanwa mailed to plaintiff’s home address various checks drawn on Sanwa and payable to her for her share of the income from Howard Properties; her then husband, Daniel LaMonte, intercepted checks totaling almost $60,000; he deposited the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.