Frank and Freedus v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 435·45 Cal. App. 4th 461·52 Cal. Rptr. 2d 678·96 Daily Journal DAR 5519·61 Cal. Comp. Cases 447
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1996D023289California4,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kremer, J.

The law firm of Frank and Freedus, James Lieberman and Eric Freedus (hereafter Frank and Freedus) appeal summary judgments in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) and State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund). Frank and Freedus contend the court erred in finding, as a matter of law, that neither Allstate or State Fund owed a duty to provide a defense to Frank and Freedus for a complaint by a former employee seeking damages for wrongful termination and defamation. We affirm.

Facts

In April 1993, a former attorney with Frank and Freedus, Martin Caprow, filed a complaint against Frank and Freedus alleging Frank and Freedus improperly terminated his employment on the basis he was gay and had tested positive for HIV. Caprow alleged causes of action for discrimination based on a physical handicap, violation of San Diego’s AIDS discrimination ordinance, violation of Labor Code provisions, violation of San Diego’s Human Dignity Ordinance, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. As to the defamation cause of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.