Scofield

Scofield v. Critical Air Medicine, Inc.

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 474·45 Cal. App. 4th 990·52 Cal. Rptr. 2d 915·96 Daily Journal DAR 5989·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3708
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1996B076597California7,806 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Defendants and appellants, Critical Air Medicine, Inc., Executive Air Services, Inc., Harry A. Metz, and Kenneth Malcomson (collectively Critical Air), appeal the judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and respondents Erin Scofield (Erin) and Laura Scofield (Laura), by and through their guardian ad litem, Robert Scofield (collectively, the Scofields). The jury awarded Erin and Laura $60,000 each in damages for their claims of false imprisonment.

In this fact situation involving the tort of false imprisonment, we are called upon to clarify some issues in a troublesome area of the law. We conclude false imprisonment involves an unlawful restraint or confinement which may be effected in a variety of ways, not only by force or threat of force, but also by fraud or deceit, or any other form of unreasonable duress. The tort requires knowledge of the restraint or confinement at some time, whether contemporaneous or subsequent, and resulting harm or damage.

Because the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and the controlling instruction, although general and somewhat incomplete, was correct in law, the judgment is affirmed.

Factual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.