In Re Tabatha G.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1161 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1162 OPINION Tina G. appeals a judgment of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 366.26 as to her minor daughter Tabatha G. Tina contends the court erred in (1) failing to apply a "best interests" exception to terminating her parental rights based on Tabatha's relationship with her grandmother and (2) ordering the discovery of a bonding study between Tabatha and Tina in violation of the attorney work product doctrine and the psychotherapist-patient privilege. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The circumstances of Tabatha's history as a dependent child of the juvenile court and Tina's involvement with San Diego County Department of Social Services (Department) are set forth in detail in two unpublished opinions from this court in prior appeals, Tina G. v. Superior Court (Jan. 7, 1993) D017092 (nonpub. opn.) and In re Tabatha G. (Sept.…