Copp

Copp v. Paxton

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 466·45 Cal. App. 4th 829·52 Cal. Rptr. 2d 831·96 Daily Journal DAR 5869·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3634
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1996A069856California7,011 words

Opinion

Opinion

Swager, J.

This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint for defamation and related tort causes of action. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

On February 24, 1994, Douglas F. Copp, and two organizations under his control, The American Rescue Team, and Earthquake Preparedness and Rescue of California (hereafter referred to collectively as Copp), filed a complaint against a county officer, Kent F. Paxton (hereafter Paxton), the County of San Mateo, and the San Mateo Operational Area Office of Emergency Services (hereafter referred to collectively as County), alleging causes of action for defamation, invasion of privacy by placing plaintiff in a false light, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional interference with contract. Paxton and County subsequently moved for summary judgment, relying chiefly on the executive officer privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision (a). In a hearing on February 2, 1995, the court granted the motion for summary judgment upon a finding that all the communications “complained of here are absolutely privileged under Civil Code section 47, [subdivision] (a).” Copp appeals from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.