Burnett

People v. Burnett

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 4th 469·15 Cal. Rptr. 2d 638·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 21·93 Daily Journal DAR 566·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 299
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 1993B057339California2,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

A jury convicted Charles Burnett and Herbert Shedd (appellants) of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and the trial court sentenced each of them to a 25-years-to-life state prison term. They contend the judgment must be reversed because the trial court: (1) made disparaging comments about defense counsel, (2) prematurely determined prosecution witnesses were not accomplices, (3) failed to admonish a misbehaving juror, (4) unduly restricted defense cross-examination, (5) failed to instruct on voluntary manslaughter, (6) failed to give an identity instruction (CALJIC No. 2.91), and (7) gave an erroneous torture instruction (CALJIC No. 8.26). We find no error and affirm the judgment.

Procedural and Factual Background

On August 7, 1989, the District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed an information alleging Charles Burnett and Herbert Shedd murdered Kellie Beasley on November 16, 1988. Appellants pleaded not guilty. A jury trial began March 7, 1990. On June 14, 1990, the jury being hopelessly deadlocked, a mistrial was declared.

On November 13,1990, a second jury trial began. On December 28,1990, the jury found each appellant guilty of first degree murder. Each was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.