People v. SUPERIOR COURT (HENRY)

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 4th 1308·15 Cal. Rptr. 2d 896·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 71·93 Daily Journal DAR 1350·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 710
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 1993B070061California1,204 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Here we hold that where a person has been committed as a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO), the maximum term of commitment under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6316.1 does not run while the person is on outpatient status. We grant the People’s petition for a writ of mandate.

Facts

Charles Edward Henry was convicted of one count of child molestation (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)), and committed to Atascadero State Hospital as a mentally disordered sex offender on May 19, 1977. The maximum term of commitment was four years. (§ 6316.1.)

Henry had served all but five months and eighteen days of the maximum term in actual custody, when he was released from Atascadero as an outpatient on July 17, 1980, on the conditional release program. (Pen. Code, § 1600 et seq.) Since that date there have been annual review hearings at which Henry’s outpatient status had been renewed. (Pen. Code, § 1606.) The last annual review hearing was held in February of 1992.

A progress report hearing was held on September 1 and 10 of 1992. At that hearing Henry made a motion to terminate his commitment on the ground that the court had lost jurisdiction. Henry’s theory was that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.