People v. Superior Court (Peterson)

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 4th 16·14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 685·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1479·92 Daily Journal DAR 17248·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10299
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1992D017419California4,419 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kremer, J.

The People, by petition for a writ of mandate , seek to vacate a sentencing order requiring Bryan Scott Peterson to serve 200 days in the custody of a private, noncontract work furlough facility. The People contend under Penal Code section 1208, only the work furlough administrator has the discretion to place a convicted person in a work furlough facility and any private facility must be under contract to serve as a place of confinement for county prisoners. Peterson argues his placement in work furlough is proper as a reasonable condition of probation under section 1203.1 and authorized by section 2900.5, subdivision (f). We conclude the court lacked jurisdiction to place Peterson in work furlough either directly or as a condition of probation. Additionally we determine a noncontract facility may not be used for custody of county prisoners. Accordingly we grant the petition.

Factual and Procedural Background

El Cajon police officers searched Peterson’s residence pursuant to a warrant on March 12, 1992. They found approximately eight pounds of marijuana, two rifles and nunchaku. Peterson was charged with possessing marijuana for sale while armed with a firearm (Health &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.