People v. Clark

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 4th 663·15 Cal. Rptr. 2d 709·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1523·93 Daily Journal DAR 1015·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 541
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1992A058237California1,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

Defendant Wesley William Clark (appellant) was charged in a complaint with continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 years (Pen. Code, § 288.5), commission of a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 years (§ 288, subd. (b)), and oral copulation of a child under the age of 14 years and more than 10 years younger than appellant (§ 288a, subd. (c)). The complaint also alleged several special allegations and that appellant had two serious prior felony convictions within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a).

Pursuant to a negotiated disposition appellant pled no contest to the continuous sexual abuse and oral copulation charges. The other charges and allegations were dismissed. A condition of the plea was that any sentence imposed for the oral copulation would run concurrent to the sentence for the continuous abuse. The superior court sentenced appellant to state prison for the upper term of 16 years for the continuous abuse. A concurrent sentence was imposed for the other offense.

Appellant contends: “The trial court stated invalid reasons for imposing the upper term.” This contention lacks merit.

At the sentencing hearing probation was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.